2018 up to now | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007

(older archive entries before 2007 are not shown here, but included in the onsite-search)

Mailing List - Entries of 2007

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [QF-Test] Regarding Log Messages

  • Subject: RE: [QF-Test] Regarding Log Messages
  • From: "Alfred Mathavan" <amathava@?.com>
  • Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 03:49:40 -0600

Hi Greg,

The rc.check(1, "!_skipped_: ...") produces a "Check OK: !_skipped_: ..." output in the Log.

This is similar to "rc.logMessage(' Test Case ID Check 3 !_skipped_: .')"

>> Perhaps logging your "verification skipped" messages at warning level
might be a good compromise

The problem here is we get a lot of warnings due to other component recognitions.
We do not give significant importance to the overcome the warnings at this point of time as long as the scripts are executed as expected.
The rc.logWarning($(msg)) will club the message with other warnings and will again be a tough job for distinguish this amongst other warnings.

If a Blue square encapsulates the nodes at the high-level where we log a warning or information that would be fine.

We're used to logging such information using the Rational Functional Tester earlier.


-----Original Message-----
From: Gregor Schmid [mailto:Gregor.Schmid@?.de]
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2007 12:13 AM
To: qftest-list@?.de
Cc: Alfred Mathavan
Subject: Re: [QF-Test] Regarding Log Messages

Hi Alfred,

for messages without an error level of Warning, Error or Exception
there naturally is nothing to propagate in the run-log.

Also, if you are using compact run-logs, nodes that do not contribute
to the report may be removed.

Perhaps logging your "verification skipped" messages at warning level
might be a good compromise. Otherwise you can either make the run-log
non-compact or use rc.check with a message starting wit '!' and some
keyword that you can easily search for , e.g.

rc.check(1, "!_skipped_: ...")

Best regards,

"Alfred Mathavan" <amathava@?.com> writes:

>    Hi Greg,
>    When some of the verifications in a test case are not performed due to
>    various reasons by a QF-Test Scripts, I log a message mentioning that
>    the verification is skipped.
>    But, in the final log output at the high-level I do not get any
>    intimation that some verifications were skipped.
>    The Red box indication is a good indication of a failure, however
>    there is no color indication for information and messages.
>    This is actually putting the SQA team into trouble to find out the
>    skipped verifications.
>    Any help in this will help me to address their needs.
>    Greetings,
>    Alfred Mathavan
> _______________________________________________
> qftest-list mailing list
> qftest-list@?.de
> http://www.qfs.de/mailman/listinfo/qftest-list

Gregor Schmid                                Gregor.Schmid@?.de
Quality First Software GmbH                     http://www.qfs.de
Tulpenstr. 41                                Tel: +49 8171 919870
DE-82538 Geretsried                          Fax: +49 8171 919876
GF: Gregor Schmid, Karlheinz Kellerer          HRB München 140833