Comparaison Selenium vs. QF‑Test

Comparing the features of the testing tools:
Selenium vs. QF-Test

• There is already a big difference in the Setup and Programming, because testers usually don't have the technical expertise to set up development environments. Selenium requires good development skills to be able to configure Selenium IDE and the Selenium server. This is different at QF-Test: Non-developers can work with the tool, easily and quickly.
• With regard to supported technologies QF-Test supports. Java, Web and hybrid applications are not a problem. Selenium just functions for web applications.
• The target group of QF-Test are testers as well as developers. Selenium requires programming skills and is accordingly primary addressed to developers. Selenium doesn't have an intuitive design.
• QF-Test can impress with regard to capture and replay: The capture of actions and checks and the direct editing of the captured steps belong to the basic functionalities of QF-Test. Selenium just captures actions and checks via Firefox plugin, however, the editing of captured steps is limited. Moreover Selenium IDE is just developed further reluctantly.
• There is a big disadvantage of Selenium compared to QF-Test in object recognition: GUI-objects must be administered on code level and can only be administered centrally by the consistent use of special programming patterns. QF-Test recognizes components through fixed IDs of the GUI objects or a multi-level and customizable detection algorithm that is tolerant to element changes in the hierarchy.
• Dynamic ids and other non-deterministic AJAX component naming is supported out-of-the-box with QF-Test. And this is in addition to the built in test run analysis, reporting, debugging, maintainability and data driven testing.
• To be able to reuse Selenium tests you need special knowledge in object oriented programming. A modular and extensible design pattern is built in to QF-Test.
• A further advantage of QF-Test is its extensive documentation in English and German, the professional support and training consulting directly from the authors which isn’t offered like this at Selenium.
• Furthermore you can integrate the existing Java based Selenium tests directly in QF-Test and even develop combined Selenium/QF-Test tests since QF-Test version 4.1.
• Selenium is very popular among developers. For this tool employees and solutions can be found due to the great community via online search, however there are often releases at Selenium that require the adaption of the test code, since backwarts compatibility is not part of the main objectives of this tool.
• You can work with QF-Test as well as Selenium very modularly and integrate unit tests. QF-Test brings a sophisticated component management innately, while an individual solution must be developed when using Selenium.