 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| Version 7.0.5 |
Modern web applications are generally very interactive and their look and feel is comparable to desktop applications. Behind these applications is a whole zoo of web frameworks that drive them, each with a different focus and unique set of widgets. Such frameworks pose a problem for QF-Test and in fact any automated testing tool for several reasons:
There is no panacea to address these problems in a generic way. In most cases QF-Test can interact with web frameworks out-of-the-box, but component recognition and performance are not ideal. Optimal testability can only be achieved with special case handling that exactly fits a given framework and takes advantage of its peculiarities.
The video 'Dealing with the
explosion of complexity in web test automation' gives you a good idea of how QF-Test handles a
deeply nested DOM structure.
QF-Test ships with optimized CustomWebResolver configuration for a number of frameworks:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Table 49.7: Supported web frameworks | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The given short name can be used in the 'Install CustomWebResolver' node category base,
see subsection 49.1.2.2.
QF-Test is even able to automatically detect whether one of those frameworks is used in your
web application and to install the respective resolver.
The short name autodetect activates this mechanism.
A web framework resolver is a set of resolvers and other methods implemented specifically for a given web framework. Most notably QF-Test tries to assign individual classes matching the high-level widgets to DOM nodes and remove intermediate nodes that are just an implementation detail. 'Name', 'Feature' and 'Extra feature' attributes are determined in a way suitable for the framework and events are simulated on the correct DOM node in a way that most closely matches user interaction. These measures drastically reduce the component hierarchy and increase the reliability and performance of component recognition and replay. Timing and synchronization are also addressed.
As a necessary consequence the components and events recorded for a given web application vary drastically with and without an active web framework resolver and are not compatible with each other. Thus, the decision whether to use a web framework resolver should be made as early as possible, otherwise tests will either need to be reimplemented after activating the resolver or tests with and without resolver must be cleanly separated. If a resolver is available for your application you should practically always use it. The only exception is if the existing test base is already too large, mostly complete and stable.
Implementing web framework resolvers is an ongoing process. As development of a web framework continues, the associated CustomWebResolver may also have to be updated. Therefore, the built-in CustomWebResolvers are marked with a version number that corresponds to the version number of the framework for which the resolver was originally designed. As long as there are no incompatible changes, this CustomWebResolver can also be used for newer versions of the framework.
Older CustomWebResolvers in QF-Test still use a versioning scheme that is independent of the framework version. These will be updated to the new versioning scheme on their next update.
Web framework resolvers are activated via the 'Install CustomWebResolver' node where you can provide the version to use. You can choose to specify only the major version, in which case QF-Test uses the latest medium.minor version available for this major version. This is normally the best option and used in the SUT startup sequences created with QF-Test's Quickstart Wizard (see chapter 3). Alternatively you can specify major.medium version or even major.medium.minor to use an exact version and thus run your tests with the resolver version with which they were created.
Any web framework has its custom way of setting unique IDs. Please find details about the supported ones in the following chapter:
The simplest solution is to set the 'ID' attribute <div id="myId"/>
for any required component.
You can set IDs like
var container = Ext.create('Ext.container.Container', {
id: 'MyContainerId',
...
});
As alternative you can also call
container.getEl().set({ 'qfs-id': 'myId' });. In
this case you will need to implement a NameResolver for reading
'qfs-id' as name for QF-Test.
The simplest way is calling the method
widget.getElement().setId("myId");
for the required widgets.
As an alternative you can also call
widget.ensureDebugId("myId"). But if you want to
use that method you need to modify your xxx.gwt.xml
file to enable debug IDs. Add <inherits
name="com.google.gwt.user.Debug"/> to the file.
It's also possible to set a custom identifier which can then be used via a
NameResolver.For example call setAttribute("qfs-id", "myId") to set an
'qfs-id' attribute.
The simplest solution is to set the 'ID' attribute <p:inputText id="myId"/>
for any required component in the xhtml definition.
The simplest solution is to set the 'ID' attribute <p:inputText id="myId"/>
for any required component. Additionally, you can give an existing element an id with:
$(element).attr("id","myId");
The simplest solution is to set the 'ID' attribute <p:inputText id="myId"/>
for any required component.
You need to set the 'ID' attribute in your source code or graphical editor.
The simplest solution is to set the 'ID' attribute <p:inputText id="myId"/>
for any required component in the xhtml definition.
There is no default mechanism. You can either apply a custom attribute to the
generated DOM nodes or add a custom attribute to the setData method
of the widget. You can evaluate those attributes in a resolver.
Starting with RAP version 2.2 a name set via widget.setData("name", "myId")
is retrieved automatically by QF-Test, just as for SWT. This field can only be used if it is registered with WidgetUtil.registerDataKeys("name"); before.
For RAP versions older than 3.0.0 the following technique is also available. It is discouraged because it deviates from the SWT standard and requires additional settings for the webserver:
Call the method widget.setData(WidgetUtil.CUSTOM_WIDGET_ID, "myId");
for the required widgets.
After applying IDs to components you need to modify your
webserver environment and specify the following
parameter -Dorg.eclipse.rap.rwt.enableUITests=true
before launching the webserver.
Note: The VM argument was renamed in RAP 2.0. For RAP versions older than 2.0 its
name is -Dorg.eclipse.rap.rwt.enableUITests=true.
You need to set the 'ID' attribute in your source code or graphical editor.
The simplest solution is to call widget.setID("id")
for any required component.
The simplest solution is to call widget.setId("id")
(widget.setDebugId("id") for Vaadin version < 7)
for any required component.
You can also set a custom stylesheet class, which you could read with a
NameResolver. Therefore call
widget.setStyleName("qfs-id=myId").
QF-Test uses the widget ID, which is also used in the
zul files, so you should get meaningful IDs for
most of the objects.
The ZK framework also offers a custom IDGenerator to set such IDs. But implementing this could be quite exhaustive. In this case it might be a better choice to rely on the default mechanism of QF-Test.
| | | | | | | Last update: 9/19/2023 Copyright © 1999-2023 Quality First Software GmbH |
