List Icon
Archiv Mailingliste

2019 bis Juli 2022  2018  | 2017 2016 2015 | 2014 | 2013

Die Mailingliste ist seit Juli 2022 geschlossen, dient aber weiterhin als Informationsarchiv zu QF-Test.
Wenn Sie aber über Neuerungen zu QF-Test informiert bleiben wollen, können Sie einfach unseren
Newsletter abonnieren

Um aktuell die Informationen zu jeder Release - auch Minor Releases - zu bekommen, können Sie den
RSS-Feed abonnieren oder uns in sozialen Medien folgen.
Alternativ bietet QF-Test auch selbst eine Versionsinformation an.

Eine weitere Informationsquelle ist unser Blog, in dem es aktuelle Beiträge zu allgemeinen Themen, zur Firma QFS und auch diverse "How-Tos" gibt:
Blog abonnieren


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[QF-Test] How to setup dependencies after each test case without breaking the flow


  • Subject: [QF-Test] How to setup dependencies after each test case without breaking the flow
  • From: Nedvěd, Marek <m.nedved@?.de>
  • Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 11:38:53 +0000
  • Delivered-to: qftest-list@?.net

Hello,

 

I am trying to add a script to my QFTest suite, which would search SUT logs for errors after each test case. However, I am having trouble to setup the dependency chain so it fires after each test case and doesn’t break the flow.

 

So far I’ve tried to add second dependency reference to the “main” dependency (Dep1 in the picture), which starts the application, but the problem is, that it breaks the flow and each time another dependency is set (DepenB), it gets after each test case reset (Cleanup of DepenB gets fired after each test case). Interestingly – the Cleanup of the main dependency (DepenA) isn’t fired.

 

More successful I’ve been by putting the parsing procedure to the Setup of the “main” dependency, then the other dependencies are saved, but the downside is, that the errors in logs would be assigned to the following test and I would have to add one  “fake” test  after the last test case. And it doesn’t feel right.

 

I hope I am somewhat clear on what I’m trying to achieve. Is there a trick how could I do that or do I have to call the Procedure in each nested cleanup?

 

 

Mit freundlichen Grüßen

Marek Nedvěd

qualitype GmbH - IT works.

_________________________

 

Marek Nedvěd

Softwaretester

 

Tel +49 351 8838 2800 | m.nedved@xxxxxxxxxxxx

 

qualitype GmbH | Moritzburger Weg 67 | 01109 Dresden | Germany

Tel +49 351 8838 2800 | Fax +49 351 8838 2809 | www.qualitype.de

 

Sitz der Gesellschaft / Head office: Dresden | Amtsgericht Dresden HRB 31753

Geschäftsführer / Management: Dr. Wilhelm Zörgiebel | Dr. Frank Götz