[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [QF-Test] Interworking between 'waitForComponent', rc.getComponent and rc.getOverrideElement
Hello Bernhard, that's a very good question. The problem is that rc.getComponent has a 0 timeout because it blocks the event dispatch thread. This means that you have to run 'WaitForComponent' first so that you can be sure to pick up the correct component in rc.getComponent. Unfortunately rc.getComponent then incurs the same overhead again. We'll see about introducing a doctag to the WaitForComponent node that puts the resulting component directly into rc.overrideElement. That should be preferable to using a WaitForComponent plus a script node even when the overhead is minimal. Best regards, Greg Bernhard Schmitt <bernhard.schmitt@?.de> writes: > Hello, > > I have a short technical question. Consider a web application with a component which is not easy to recognize and > which takes a while until QF-Test has mapped it to its internal component. > > Our purpose is, to cache such a component with rc.overrideElement(), so that the time expensive recognition happens > only one time. > > So the question is, what happens inbetween 'WaitForComponent' and rc.getElement, and rc.getOverrideElement(). > > 1. When WaitForComponent(id) succeeds, is it certain that the web component is accesible and I can immediatly > cache it with rc.getOverrideElement(id) > > 2. When I call rc.getComponent(„id“) after WaitForComponent(id) succeeds, ist the component recognized again > with the same time effort as before? > > BR > > Bernhard -- Gregor Schmid E: gregor.schmid@?.de T: +49 8171 38648-11 F: +49 8171 38648-16 Quality First Software GmbH | www.qfs.de Tulpenstr. 41 | 82538 Geretsried | Germany GF Gregor Schmid, Dr. Martina Schmid, Karlheinz Kellerer HRB München 140833
|