List Icon
Mailing list Archive

2019 up to July 2022 | 20182017  |  2016  2015 2014 | 2013

The mailing list has been closed since July 2022, but continues to serve as an archive of information about QF-Test.
But if you want to stay informed about news about QF-Test, you can simply
Subscribe to Newsletter  

To get up-to-date information about each release - including minor releases - you can
subscribe to the RSS feed or follow us on social media.
Alternatively, QF-Test also provides release information itself.

Another source of information is our blog, where there are current articles on general topics, on the company QFS and also various "how-tos"
subscribe to blog

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [QF-Test] Passing Variables between distributed instances of QFTest

  • Subject: Re: [QF-Test] Passing Variables between distributed instances of QFTest
  • From: Gregor Schmid <Gregor.Schmid@?.de>
  • Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2014 09:48:14 +0200

Hello Ron,

it is not possible to get bindings at _any_ level, either in the
Daemon or during normal playback, but you have access to the global
variables and to variable groups in the form of Properties.

Please see the DaemonRunContext methods

public String getGlobal(String name)
public Properties getGlobals()
public String getProperty(String group, String name)
public Properties getProperties(String group)

in manual section 40.2.4:

If that is not sufficient for what you intend to do, please get back
to our support with more details and we'll try to help.

Best regards,

Ron Britzius <britziusr@?.net> writes:

> Hello,
> We are using version 3.5 of QFTest and are currently trying to expand our current library of
> QFTest suites to include distributed tests over multiple SUTs interacting with one-another.  My
> question is this: is it possible to get the bindings of any level of variable (Global, Local,
> Fallback) from a running daemon?  Ideally, we would like to have one "master" qftest station
> directing other daemons, receiving information from them, and recording the information in our
> custom report. We would like to use variables for the handling of this information as this is how
> we have handled verification for local testing. Is this kind of variable-passing possible? If not,
> what options exist to coordinate remote tests and pass information between the remote SUTs?
> Thank you,
> Ron Britzius

Gregor Schmid

E: gregor.schmid@?.de
T: +49 (0)8171 38648-11
F: +49 (0)8171 38648-16

Quality First Software GmbH |
Tulpenstr. 41 | 82538 Geretsried | Germany
GF Gregor Schmid, Karlheinz Kellerer
HRB München 140833