Mailing List - Entries of 2013

List Icon
Mailing list Archive

2019 up to July 2022 | 2018 | 2017  |  2016  | 2015 | 2014 | 2013

The mailing list has been closed since July 2022, but continues to serve as an archive of information about QF-Test.
But if you want to stay informed about news about QF-Test, you can simply
Subscribe to Newsletter  

To get up-to-date information about each release - including minor releases - you can
subscribe to the RSS feed or follow us on social media.
Alternatively, QF-Test also provides release information itself.

Another source of information is our blog, where there are current articles on general topics, on the company QFS and also various "how-tos"
subscribe to blog

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [QF-Test] Size mismatch Error problem

  • Subject: Re: [QF-Test] Size mismatch Error problem
  • From: Michael Höber, QFS Support <support@?.de>
  • Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 15:28:58 +0100

Hello,

 

when running on different machines or operating systems, the SUT's windows may be at different size resulting in failed image checks with size mismatches.

You should always ensure to have your windows being the same size.

To do so please insert a 'Component event' with COMPONENT_RESIZED and specify the component ID of the window itself.

Define a size which is possible at all machines.

Please see:

http://www.qfs.de/qftest/manual/en/events.html#step_ComponentEventStep

 

You can also define an 'Actual check region inside image' at the 'Check image' node. For example, if there’s a part at the right which you don’t care about, then you can define a region for the left part only. QF-Test will then check this part only and accept larger images because it ignores the got size if it's large enough. Please see:

http://www.qfs.de/qftest/manual/en/checks.html#step_CheckImageStep

 

You can also have a look at QF-Test's advanced image checks. There you can  find the possibility to resize images before checking, but then got image will get scaled.

Please see:

http://www.qfs.de/qftest/manual/en/tech_imagealgorithmdetails.html#sec_imagealgorithmdetails

A sample algorithm for scaling/resizing the image could be:

algorithm=similarity;expected=0.98;resize=true

 

But I think first of all  you should take care of identically sized windows at all testing machines.

 

Best regards,

     Michael

 

--

Get the most out of QF-Test - through training directly from the authors

* via webinar       http://www.qfs.de/en/info/OnlineTraining_QF-Test.pdf

* here at QFS             http://www.qfs.de/en/info/Training_QF-Test.pdf

------------------------------------------------------------------------

QFS Support - Michael Hoeber            

Quality First Software GmbH                http://www.qfs.de

Tulpenstr. 41                         Tel: +49 8171 38648-20

DE-82538 Geretsried                   Fax: +49 8171 38648-16

GF: Gregor Schmid, Karlheinz Kellerer     HRB München 140833

 

 

From: qftest-list-bounces@?.de [mailto:qftest-list-bounces@?.de] On Behalf Of Markus.Arnold@?.com
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2013 4:18 PM
To: qftest-list@?.de
Cc: Extern.Benjamin.Schwarzmann@?.com
Subject: [QF-Test] Size mismatch Error problem

 

Hi,

 

I need to check some images with different Windows versions. The problem is, that the size of the images varies slightly for the differentwindowsversions and I get Size mismatch Errors. Is there a possibility to ignore Size mismatch Errors or avoid them with QF Test?

 

 

 

Thanks,

 

Markus Arnold

 
----------------------------------------------------------------
Please note: This e-mail may contain confidential information
intended solely for the addressee. If you have received this
e-mail in error, please do not disclose it to anyone, notify
the sender promptly, and delete the message from your system.
Thank you.

We use "Matomo" cookies to anonymously evaluate your visit to our website. For this we need your consent, which is valid for twelve months. A revocation, so-called opt-out, is possible at any time on our privacy page.

accept
configuration
Cookie configuration

1. Functional cookies

We use functional cookies to ensure the basic functionality of the website.

2. Performance and statistic cookies

We use Matomo for analyzing and optimizing our website. Cookies permit an anonymous collection of information that help us offering you a clear and user-friendly visit of our web pages.

Confirm selection

Cookie details